Friday, July 27, 2007

Global Warming - The Sun And The Apocalypse



Who has not heard the term "global warming?" These days, secular minds are absolutely obsessed with what has come to be called "anthropogenic climate change." This fancy term simply refers to the warming of our climate attributable to human beings, as opposed to natural geological and biological processes such as increasing carbon dioxide, volcanism, and the respiration of global vegetation.

Pushed along by media presentations (most prominently by Al Gore’s video production, called "An Inconvenient Truth") there is a current wave of doctrine that the human consumption of carbon-based fuels is radically changing earth’s climate. In hysterical tones, its proponents proclaim that within a few years, our atmosphere will be so charged with excess carbon dioxide and other smog-producers, that the earth will go into an irreversible heating process. The result, they say, will be vast deserts, flooded coastlines, crop failures and the deaths of millions of the people.

The zeal to promote the global warming hypothesis has now assumed the proportions of a religion. Quite simply, it is the worship of the Earth. They view the "big blue marble" as our originator and sustainer. This, of course, is the natural outgrowth of evolutionary theory. If the legendary "billions of years" from primordial ooze to intelligent human society are sufficient to produce mankind as we now know it, then maintaining the environment rises to the level of worship. Under these conditions, environmental stewardship is not merely good sense, it is religious law. "Science" becomes the clergy. Dissent is not tolerated. Already, there is action to silence any scientist who dares oppose the liberal consensus about human activity causing global climate change.

Global government is being invested with the power to enforce the credos of this new religion. For them, the greening of the planet is the number one priority. A new form of law is rapidly taking shape. This law has been committed into the ethical and moral stewardship of the UN.

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) brought forth the Kyoto Protocol. Participating countries agree to reduce their carbon dioxide and Greenhouse Gases (GHG) emissions. Over 160 nations have submitted to the protocols, supposedly bringing about fifty-five percent of the GHGs under authoritative UN control. The current drive is to achieve one-hundred percent participation … or submission.

The new religion is not without its indulgences. Heavy GHG producers can purchase "carbon credits" from less vigorous producers under various emissions trading plans. The result of this scheme is a transfer of wealth from richer to poorer countries. Most will recognize this as the religion of socialism, which has always maintained that redistribution of wealth is the road to peace.

Behind it all, the prime motivation for adherence to the new rules and regulations is the horrific vision of a coming global disaster, as judgment for the excessive consumption of energy. The global warming brigade is threatening a reign of punishment for those who fail to heed their warnings about a collapse of global weather systems.

In effect, this secular priesthood is predicting its own version of the apocalypse. Their vision centers upon certain atmospheric changes that are interpreted as harbingers of global superstorms, scorching heat and waves of human misery. They believe that man, not God, will cause the apocalypse. For them, the biggest share of the blame goes to pollution produced by the consumption of oil, coal and gas.

These frightened critics have focused their wrath upon what they see as an out-of-control free market that gobbles resources and spews fumes. Radical environmentalists demand the greening of the world. They cry, "You don’t care about the children; you don’t care about the planet; you don’t care about the future." Their usual answer to the problem is to put on the brakes by taxing commerce into submission, and imposing draconian economic penalties on the offenders.

Let’s Get Real

Before agreeing with their hysterical charges, perhaps we should take another look at the future of planet earth. The biblical -- and of course, true -- version of the Apocalypse is quite different from that imagined by political fear mongers. As is well known, the Bible has much to say about our climatic future. In fact, it speaks volumes about a future period of intense heating. But this heating is not caused by man. Nor is it caused by greenhouse gases. Rather, it is caused by the Sun, which the Bible links to this future period of blazing heat. It is caused by the Lord and has a specific purpose. A good example of this is seen in the following verses:

"And the fourth angel poured out his vial upon the sun; and power was given unto him to scorch men with fire.

"And men were scorched with great heat, and blasphemed the name of God, which hath power over these plagues: and they repented not to give him glory" (Rev. 16:8,9).

Here, we have a verse of Scripture that reveals a major Bible truth. The natural world is under God’s constant control. In this "enlightened" age, it is common to think that natural processes control themselves. Even most Christians believe that they were set in motion at some time in the ages past, from that point onward, to regulate themselves. Stars burn, until they burn themselves out. Their inner processes are driven by physical processes well known to astrophysicists. If a star (like our Sun) grows suddenly cooler or hotter, it must be because of some natural variation, like gravity, gaseous, or electromagnetic changes.

The Bible, however, is unequivocal in the matter. The Lord can send forth a messenger to change solar output. Exactly how He does this is unknown. In the above case, the result is an increase in heat output that has a direct impact upon human existence. The angel’s action causes global warming.

The Apocalypse brings other cataclysmic changes, including killer hailstorms, shifting tectonic plates and rampant volcanism will also bring earth-shattering weather. It must be stressed, however, that man’s misuse of fuel has nothing at all to do with the judgments ahead. Instead, changes in Solar activity lie at the center of these disturbances. Its output is our neighborhood’s most important feature.

The Sun, and Only the Sun

Compared with the size of the Sun, the Earth is almost a nonentity. The diameter of our home planet is 12,756 kilometers (7,926 miles). The Sun’s diameter is 1,390,000 kilometers (863,746 miles), almost 109 times larger!

The Sun is overwhelmingly gigantic when compared with all other objects in our planetary system. For example, it boasts 99.8 percent of the Solar System’s total mass! Jupiter, largest of the planets, contains most of the rest. Earth’s mass is only a tiny fraction of the remainder.

The Sun is a thermonuclear engine designed by the Lord. It produces heat and light in precisely the correct proportion for the support of carbon-based physical life as we know it. Its output is no accident of physics; it was created that way. Neither is Earth’s orbital distance from the Sun a matter of coincidence. At the speed of light, we are about eight minutes from the Sun, or 93 million miles.

At this ideal distance, the combination of solar radiation, our atmospheric composition, magnetic fields and other interplanetary factors produce an ideal climate for human life. These factors cannot be mere coincidence. Even the existence of a Moon that is about one-fourth the size of the Earth provides the tidal stability that keeps us from boiling or freezing. Science has called Earth "The Goldilocks Planet." It is neither too hot nor too cold, but just right. We are protected from hazardous radiation, but given ample light in the proper spectral range to produce warmth and growth.

Given all these factors, we must never forget the single, important factor in all this. The Sun is the only source of heat for the surface of our planet. It if dims -- even slightly -- we freeze. If it brightens -- even slightly -- we burn.

Fire, or Ice?

Our own planetary history demonstrates this principle with extreme clarity. Not so long ago, in the nineteen-sixties and seventies, scientists were actually predicting a new ice age in the not-too-distant future. Their observations drew much from the past, since the northern hemisphere was once covered by glaciers that reached as far south as the central regions of today’s America.

Furthermore, recent history reinforced their cooling hypothesis. Climatologists refer to a "Little Ice Age," which was observed in Europe between the 13th and mid-19th centuries. As late as 1816, the famous "year without a summer," witnessed freezing temperatures and frozen crops in Europe, Newfoundland and Canada. Midsummer ice on rivers and lakes, with accompanying blizzards, were recorded as far south as Pennsylvania.

It is hardly a surprise that the common factor in this climatic aberration seems to have been the Sun. It is well known that this period was marked by the virtual absence of turbulent solar storms. At times, sunspots were simply absent. Most of the time, they appeared with extreme rarity. Sunspots, by the way, are among the most well documented events in the history of astronomical observation. Literally centuries of observations are available.

Well known to astronomers is the so-called "Maunder Minimum." It marks the period from 1645 to 1715, when solar observers counted few, if any sunspots. In the year 1670, not a single one was seen. The three decades at the heart of this historical epoch produced only about 50 sunspots, as opposed to the normal 40 to 50 thousand for a similar period!

This situation, lasting about five centuries, brought the northern hemisphere much cooler temperatures than normal, in exact synchronization with diminished solar activity. More sunspots brought more heat, and vice versa. Certainly, human endeavors were in no way connected with the changes, since they happened long before the Industrial Revolution.

Interestingly, the years just prior to the Little Ice Age are referred to as "The Medieval Warm Period." During this period, explorers from Iceland were led westward from Iceland across the northern Atlantic by the famed explorer Erik the Red, whose forbearers had originally come from Norway. Around A.D. 982, they came to a lush new territory, so rich and green that they immediately colonized it. Because its southern regions were covered with lush vegetation, they promptly named it Greenland. Crops and vines flourished. Trade routes were established. Even an archdiocese from the Norwegian church was established there!

Needless to say, Greenland isn’t green anymore. After about four and a half centuries, rapid cooling quickly covered Greenland with ice. The Norwegians retreated back to their homeland. The fifteenth century brought Greenland a "Little Ice Age." From that day to this, the territory is still encrusted with ice that continues to accumulate, sometimes hundreds of feet deep, where crops used to grow and villages thrived.

These notable climatic changes all took place prior to man’s use of carbon-based fuels. There is little doubt that they are tied to solar activity, rather than the by-products of human activity, as is currently taught. If there is one Bible truth, it is that God, not man, controls the weather. The Bible asserts that He regulates the output of the Sun, and therefore, the level of heat energy throughout our planetary system.

Let’s look at few examples that demonstrate this truth.

Joel’s Fivefold Declaration

Long ago, the prophet Joel wrote of the Tribulation Period. Most expositors believe that it was written in the ninth century, B.C., during the reign of King Joash, king of Judah. Most fix the date of his writing at around 835 B.C., much earlier than the other prophets. This makes it all the more remarkable that the Lord gave him the defining vision of the "day of the Lord," a phrase which he uses five times.

This terrible day, chronicled in the distant past, is still future to us. Yet Joel mentions it as imminent, even though he penned these words over 28 centuries ago:

"Alas for the day! for the day of the LORD is at hand, and as a destruction from the Almighty shall it come" (Joel 1:15).

Five times, Joel invokes the name, "day of the Lord," the dreadful day of the Lord’s wrath. The phrase, "at hand" tells us that these words were written for the Israel of the latter days. It is intended to convey the conditions of the Tribulation.

The second time he uses the term, he associates it with an invading army, whose power is such that they are capable of reducing the land to a smoldering ruin:

"Blow ye the trumpet in Zion, and sound an alarm in my holy mountain: let all the inhabitants of the land tremble: for the day of the LORD cometh, for it is nigh at hand;

"A day of darkness and of gloominess, a day of clouds and of thick darkness, as the morning spread upon the mountains: a great people and a strong; there hath not been ever the like, neither shall be any more after it, even to the years of many generations.

"A fire devoureth before them; and behind them a flame burneth: the land is as the garden of Eden before them, and behind them a desolate wilderness; yea, and nothing shall escape them" (Joel 2:1-3).

His third mention concludes the same thought:

"And the LORD shall utter his voice before his army: for his camp is very great: for he is strong that executeth his word: for the day of the LORD is great and very terrible; and who can abide it?" (Joel 2:11).

Joel’s fourth invocation of future cataclysm elevates the nature of the catastrophe to a distinctly higher level. Here, Earth’s weather systems seem to go completely awry, producing an atmosphere that obscures the Sun and Moon:

"And I will shew wonders in the heavens and in the earth, blood, and fire, and pillars of smoke.

"The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before the great and the terrible day of the LORD come.

"And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the LORD shall be delivered: for in mount Zion and in Jerusalem shall be deliverance, as the LORD hath said, and in the remnant whom the LORD shall call" (Joel 2:30-32).

His final use of the term seems to transcend Earth’s weather systems entirely. Here, in the worst calamities of the Tribulation, the Sun, itself seems to be affected:

"Put ye in the sickle, for the harvest is ripe: come, get you down; for the press is full, the vats overflow; for their wickedness is great.

"Multitudes, multitudes in the valley of decision: for the day of the LORD is near in the valley of decision.

"The sun and the moon shall be darkened, and the stars shall withdraw their shining" (Joel 3:13-15).

These words describe an astronomic and meteorological tragedy of the first magnitude. This disaster is far worse than any vision summoned up by the global warming congregation. A close examination of the biblical account of the Tribulation reveals a disruption, not only of the Earth’s immediate environment, but also of the entire Solar System. Apparently, the air will be filled with obscuring debris, perhaps from volcanoes. But in addition to this, the Sun’s output will be diminished. The Moon, being a reflector of the Sun’s light, also dims. The assertions of the prophets, like Joel, fly in the face of current scientific belief, which insists that rapid changes in natural processes simply don’t happen.

Astronomers and geophysicists think in terms of millions of years, during which time change is slow and steady … barely perceptible. Such thinking as been labeled "uniformitarianism." It is the stuff of evolutionary thought, holding to the theory that the present functions as the model for the past. Under this view, conditions on Earth are generally conceived as absolutely stable, with change coming in small increments, rather than global convulsions.

The Day of the Lord

However, the "day of the Lord" is always viewed as global in nature, not local. And it is definitely a convulsion. Like the great Flood of Noah, it will affect the entire Earth. Science has always scoffed at the reality of a worldwide flood, refusing to believe that such a thing could happen. This is probably because they are unable to hypothesize a set of conditions that would produce a flood of biblical proportions. Again, the answer to this problem is simple: God controls the weather.

Not only will the day of the Lord be global in nature, it will be a time of destabilized chaos, unparalleled in history. Jesus, Himself, described it as uniquely horrifying:

"For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.

"And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect’s sake those days shall be shortened" (Matt. 24:21,22).

Jesus here speaks of the Tribulation, which is another way of speaking of the judgments of the day of the Lord. Taking His words literally, the Tribulation will be the worst upheaval ever to afflict planet Earth. From our human perspective, with two thousand years of relative calm in the geosphere, it would be difficult to overestimate the intensity of that day. Trying to conceive of the horrors of the Tribulation is almost beyond our imagination. Yet the history of the present world system, dating back to Adam, includes many large-scale catastrophes, including the Flood of Noah, which was far more than a condition of rising water.

Students who hold Scripture to be divinely inspired believe that the Earth of those days endured both a global flood and some kind of major rearrangement of the continents. This being true, Jesus’ statement about the coming judgment is powerful, indeed. He says the Tribulation is to be even more violent than that. Not only was there a worldwide flood, but also great cracks and shifting of the Earth’s crust:

"And it came to pass after seven days, that the waters of the flood were upon the earth.

"In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.

"And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights" (Gen. 7:10-12).

It has been suggested that these "fountains of the great deep" may well have been volcanoes, spewing great clouds of various gases (including superheated water vapor) into the air. For a very long time, the Sun was not even visible. Slowly, the air cleared and the waters of the flood receded, revealing a volatile new world of winds, weather, thunderstorms, tornadoes, hurricanes and all the rest.

Prior to this deluge, Earth’s meteorology was so stable that the weather systems did not even produce precipitation. As difficult as this is to believe, the Bible is unequivocal about the matter. In the following verses, we must take note of two things. First, it did not rain, and second, God is revealed as the cause of the rain:

"These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens,

"And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground.

"But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground" (Gen. 2:4).

Here, as others have chronicled in great detail, solar radiation, Earth’s geology and climate were far different from today’s conditions. God tailored the environment for His creation.

In other words, God controls the weather, the climate and the interaction between the Earth and the Sun. He is both Creator and Controller, who at that point in the history of the planet, had not yet caused it to rain. This is a far cry from modern opinion, which holds that somehow, man is the chief influence on weather systems.

In this day of radar and satellite monitoring, we sometimes credit the weatherman with control of the weather. When he brings good weather, he receives congratulations; when it’s bad he gets blamed, as though he actually caused it. This is a convenient little lie we tell ourselves, so we will not live in fear of catastrophe. Some theorists go so far as to say that we are on the verge of planetary weather control. Given the present state of understanding, this is ridiculous.

In fact, meteorologists continually protest that they are unable to predict weather patterns beyond a few days at the most. Nevertheless, on local television, there is always a competition to see who can forecast the weather beyond a seven-day period. And think of this: The hysteria about global warming is always placed in the context of man’s complete inability to control his environment. Its proponents continually scream about humanity being on the brink of uncontrollable disaster. Many of them proclaim that we are only a few years from tipping the climate past the point of no return.

Leaping forth from this noisy background of contradictions, the Tribulation will involve all of the upheavals of the Noahic deluge, but also several additional catastrophes, some of which reach into the heavens, and the Sun, itself.

The Future of the Sun

As is well known by science, and mentioned above, the Sun’s energy is essentially all the energy of our local planetary system. As it goes, so goes life in this part of the cosmos. Therefore, it is especially interesting to look at its future from the perspective of God in the heavens.

He created it, and He can use it to achieve whatever goal He has in mind. During the Tribulation period, His angels will go forth to unsettle global systems, even to the point that humanity will be on the verge of extinction. In the context of the Tribulation, Jesus said that conditions would be so fierce that the very survival of humanity would be at stake:

"For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.

"And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect’s sake those days shall be shortened" (Matt. 24:21,22).

Why would this be the case? What could possibly happen that would threaten human flesh? The answer to this is quite easy, particularly when we consider the current phobia about too much sunlight being carcinogenic. We’re all being encouraged to wear ultraviolet absorbent glasses and contact lenses to protect our eyes from the Sun. Television commercials by the thousands urge us to avoid prolonged exposure to the rays of the Sun, and to apply an approved sunscreen to our skin.

Why? Because a variety of cancers and other maladies can come to those who overexpose themselves to the Sun’s rays. Imagine that our atmosphere’s ability to absorb those rays is weakened by massive weather changes. Perhaps the colossal nuclear exchange that lies in our future will have this effect. Then, imagine that the nature of the Sun’s radiation is subjected to deadly alterations. Now, carefully consider the following words:

"And there shall be upon every high mountain, and upon every high hill, rivers and streams of waters in the day of the great slaughter, when the towers fall.

"Moreover the light of the moon shall be as the light of the sun, and the light of the sun shall be sevenfold, as the light of seven days, in the day that the LORD bindeth up the breach of his people, and healeth the stroke of their wound.

"Behold, the name of the LORD cometh from far, burning with his anger, and the burden thereof is heavy: his lips are full of indignation, and his tongue as a devouring fire" (Isa. 30:25-27).

If you imagine a hot summer Sun, then multiply it by seven you have some idea of what the Bible means when it invoked the image of "scorching heat." Here, the prophecy of Isaiah is certainly speaking of the closing days of the Tribulation … probably near the time of the battle of Armageddon.

Earlier, we quoted Revelation 16:8, where "… the fourth angel poured out his vial upon the sun." Isaiah’s prophecy seems to be a reference to the same event, with emphasis upon the result, rather than the cause. And the result is spectacular! Under these conditions, human beings couldn’t go outdoors without complete skin cover, plus very dark and absorbent glasses. Imagine the drought, wildfires, spontaneous combustion and the intensity of heat inside homes and vehicles. Since Adam was created, the world has never experienced such conditions.

This judgment is aimed at the kingdom of the Antichrist. Imagine the consternation of his followers, as their kingdom becomes a fiery hell on earth. Surely, they must turn on him at some point. In the same context, note the judgment of the next angel:

"And the fifth angel poured out his vial upon the seat of the beast; and his kingdom was full of darkness; and they gnawed their tongues for pain,

"And blasphemed the God of heaven because of their pains and their sores, and repented not of their deeds" (Rev. 16:10,11).

Apparently, right in the midst of blazing solar heat and blinding light, another angel darkens the Earth. The result would be unimaginable … heat in darkness. We are reminded of the Egyptian plague in the days of Moses, when for three days, they dared not move. The fear and anguish of those alive under such conditions would drive them to the brink of madness. But in their reprobate state, they refuse to repent. Instead of begging the Lord for forgiveness, they fill the air with blasphemy, blaming Him for their plight.

The Lord’s angels are invested with the power to raise the Sun’s output, then lower it. Perhaps they do it by increasing the number of sunspots or solar storms. Perhaps the Sun’s energy spectrum is altered in some way. There is no way we can know. But the result is obvious. Mankind is subjected to massive doses of harmful radiation. In that day, no one will blame excessive human consumption of hydrocarbons for the climatic disasters that threaten their very lives.

Who knows the result of all this solar fury? Sunburn? Skin cancer? Blindness? It seems obvious that men will be reduced to adopting some sort of full-body covering if they venture out during the daytime. Within the last few years, massive solar storms have resulted in megatons of charged particles being hurled from the Sun’s surface. Fortunately, at this point in time, they have missed our planet. But these so-called "Coronal Mass Ejections" (CMEs), have the potential to scorch our world with both heat and radiation.

Observers credit their evasion of our planet to "good luck." On the contrary, we would call it a blessing from God. But whatever you call it, our own experience reflects the potential predicted in Scripture. Certainly, there will be a time when the Sun will rage with unbelievable heat.

Light and Dark

The judgments of the Tribulation are specifically arranged as a demonstration of God’s power. Men who believe in their understanding of "natural processes" will be shocked to learn that those processes are under the control of a mighty intellect. This idea is quite clear in Isaiah’s prophecy:

"Howl ye; for the day of the LORD is at hand; it shall come as a destruction from the Almighty.

"Therefore shall all hands be faint, and every man’s heart shall melt:

"And they shall be afraid: pangs and sorrows shall take hold of them; they shall be in pain as a woman that travaileth: they shall be amazed one at another; their faces shall be as flames.

"Behold, the day of the LORD cometh, cruel both with wrath and fierce anger, to lay the land desolate: and he shall destroy the sinners thereof out of it.

"For the stars of heaven and the constellations thereof shall not give their light: the sun shall be darkened in his going forth, and the moon shall not cause her light to shine.

"And I will punish the world for their evil, and the wicked for their iniquity; and I will cause the arrogancy of the proud to cease, and will lay low the haughtiness of the terrible.

"I will make a man more precious than fine gold; even a man than the golden wedge of Ophir.

"Therefore I will shake the heavens, and the earth shall remove out of her place, in the wrath of the LORD of hosts, and in the day of his fierce anger" (Isa. 13:6-13).

It would be easy to say that the conditions described here are simply the result of local fires, or the aftermath of a nuclear war that has filled the air with smoke and dust. But "shaking the heavens" is hardly a local catastrophe. Precisely what is meant by these words cannot be ascertained, except to say that somehow, even the Earth’s rotation and orbit will be altered. In the end, even the length of the Solar year and the length of the day will be changed.

A Future Calamity

The twenty-fourth chapter of Isaiah has often been called the "Little Apocalypse." It opens with a picture of devastation that is practically unbelievable:

"Behold, the LORD maketh the earth empty, and maketh it waste, and turneth it upside down, and scattereth abroad the inhabitants thereof" (Isaiah 24:1).

There could hardly be a more disturbing picture of total planetary destruction than this. Imagine the aftermath of nuclear war, compounded by perturbations on an astronomical scale by blazing radiation. The result would be a smoking wasteland, virtually devoid of vegetation. Men would stumble about in a daze, wondering where their next morsel of food would be found.

But Isaiah’s description of the curse that will come upon the Earth becomes even more profound:

"Fear, and the pit, and the snare, are upon thee, O inhabitant of the earth.

"And it shall come to pass, that he who fleeth from the noise of the fear shall fall into the pit; and he that cometh up out of the midst of the pit shall be taken in the snare: for the windows from on high are open, and the foundations of the earth do shake.

"The earth is utterly broken down, the earth is clean dissolved, the earth is moved exceedingly.

"The earth shall reel to and fro like a drunkard, and shall be removed like a cottage; and the transgression thereof shall be heavy upon it; and it shall fall, and not rise again.

"And it shall come to pass in that day, that the LORD shall punish the host of the high ones that are on high, and the kings of the earth upon the earth. (Isaiah 24:17-21).

How could such things happen? Somehow, the Earth’s steady rotation will be disrupted. Might it be the result of huge earthquakes that will dislodge tectonic plates? If continents were somehow loosed to slide into new positions, could they destabilize the polar alignment of our planet? Whatever the method used by the Lord to effect these massive changes, the result is clear: The present world system will fall, never to rise again.

When the Tribulation comes, let the leaders of the United Nations try to save Earth’s climate. Currently, in spite of continual complaints, we live in a state of blessing, where food abounds, and the necessities of life are taken for granted. Even the luxuries are available in a way never before seen in the history of this planet. Yet even under these circumstances, fear mongers cry that humanity is on the brink of extinction.

What will they say in the day of great earthquakes, when the globe is shaken? Think about these words:

"And the heaven departed as a scroll when it is rolled together; and every mountain and island were moved out of their places" (Rev. 6:14).

And how will they react when their dread of a bombardment from the heavens becomes an actuality? It will, as the following words plainly declare:

"And the second angel sounded, and as it were a great mountain burning with fire was cast into the sea: and the third part of the sea became blood"

"And the third part of the creatures which were in the sea, and had life, died; and the third part of the ships were destroyed.

"And the third angel sounded, and there fell a great star from heaven, burning as it were a lamp, and it fell upon the third part of the rivers, and upon the fountains of waters; (Rev. 8:8-10).

The religion that places its faith in global stability is about to be smashed. Those who look to a green Earth for their salvation are about to be severely tested. On the other hand, those whose faith rests upon the finished work of Christ will be spared from His wrath. Our faith is not in this planet, nor is it in the Solar System. Global warming? You ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

By Gary Stearman - Prophecy In The News

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Hate Terminology In Arabic

The Ma’an News Service publishes numerous daily announcements in Arabic, which it subsequently translates and releases in English. In recent stories, PMW has noted that the Ma'an releases in Arabic include the hate ideology espoused by the terror organizations that deny Israel's right to exist, express reverence for suicide terrorists and justify terrorist murder as "resistance." But when translated into English, the same stories go through a sterilization process to hide from the English readers – and possibly from the two Western countries, the Netherlands and Denmark, who give them funding – the terrorist ideology Ma'an is helping to propagate.

The following are two examples:

1 – On Jan. 29, 2007, a suicide terrorist killed three Israelis in the city of Eilat. The Ma'an Arabic report included the language of the terror organizations, while the English was cleansed with changes and omissions, including changes to the language of direct quotes. The differences are striking:

Denial of Israel's right to exist
In English Ma'an accurately reports that the event happened "in the southern Israeli resort of Eilat." But in the original Arabic, Eilat is changed from an Israeli city to a Palestinian city occupied by Israel – reflecting the terrorist assertion that all of Israel is “occupied Palestine.

Ma'an English: "…in the southern Israeli resort of Eilat." Ma'an Arabic in first reference: "… in Eilat located in the south of occupied Palestine." Ma'an Arabic in second reference: "…carried out a brave deed and for the first time in occupied Eilat.”

In the English the mother is referred to simply by her name and age: "Ruwaida Siksik, 42." In Arabic Ma'an adds: " Ruwaida Siksik, 42, whose family originated from the occupied city of Jaffa."

The routine definition in a news story of Jaffa, a part of southern Tel Aviv, as "occupied" and Eilat as "occupied Palestine" is a way to linguistically express denial of Israel's right to exist, and is the terminology used by the terror organizations.

Glorifying suicide terror as Shahada – revered Martyrdom
The act of the suicide bombing is likewise reported differently in the English and the Arabic. The English refers to a "bombing," while the Arabic gives it an idyllic Islamic categorization of an "Amaliyyah Ishtish'hadyyah" - a Shahada-seeking action. This is not merely a positive categorization, but is defining the suicide bombing as an honored Islamic action. The perpetrator is given the status of a Ishtish'hadi- Shahada-seeker, who becomes after his death a Shahid – a revered holy Martyr.

In Arabic: "She heard the news on Monday morning that he died as a Shahid …

In English: "Family of Eilat bomber"

In Arabic: "mother of the Shahada-seeker"

Another interesting difference is that in the Arabic, the brother of the bomber admits to knowing that his brother was leaving on a terror operation. This is omitted from the English version.

2- The second article demonstrating the terror support by Ma'an is its release yesterday about the murder of Erez Levanon, a 42-year-old Israeli musician and father of three children, who was attacked and stabbed to death by two Palestinians while praying in a field.

The Ma'an English: "Palestinian sources told Ma'an that armed Palestinian men ambushed an Israeli …"

The Ma'an Arabic: "Palestinian sources told Ma'an that Palestinian resistance men ambushed an Israeli …"

This is not just semantics. In choosing to categorize murder as "resistance," Ma'an is choosing the language used by terror organizations to justify murder.

The following is the chart of the changes in the translation of the suicide bombing story, followed by the visuals of yesterday's story. Ma’an in English


Family of Eilat bomber speak to Ma'an..
Ma’an in Arabic
[PMW translation to English]


Mother of the Shahada-seeker [Martrydom Seeker - Islamic term of honor for suicide bomber] and his wife speak …

She heard the news on Monday morning that he had blown himself up
She heard the news on Monday morning that he died as a shahid [Islamic term for revered Martyr]

in an unprecedented operation in the southern Israeli resort of Eilat… in an unprecedented operation in
Eilat located in the south of occupied Palestine…

Did his mother, Ruwaida Siksik, 42,
Did his mother, Ruwaida Siksik, 42, whose family originated from the occupied city of Jaffa,

know about her fourth son's intention to operate in Israel? know about her fourth son's intention to carry out a Shahada – Seeking operation in Israel?
She said: "I knew he wished for
Shahada …”
She said: "I knew he wished for Shahada -Seeking and for Shahada…"
On Monday 29th January, the son's identity was reported as being the bomber of Eilat. On Monday, was reported the death as a Shahid of (her) son, and
The mother prayed that it may send a message to the fighting brothers in Hamas and Fatah, to stop and direct their weapons against the Israeli occupation. the mother prayed that Allah will receive her son as a Shahid…
She added that she is ready to sacrifice all of her nine sons and daughters for Palestine and Al-Aqsa mosque… She added that she is ready to sacrifice all of her nine sons and daughters for Palestine and Al-Aqsa mosque, and that she will not be stingy with them…
Muhammad's brother, Na'im, 26, said:

"What my brother has done is dignifying for all of us…”
Muhammad's brother, Na'im, 26, said: "I knew he was leaving and I wished him that he would achieve Shahada as he wants. When I heard the news about his Shahada-seeking, I prayed for him, that Allah will receive him. What my brother has done is dignifying for all of us…”

Nadia Siksik, wife of the
deceased bomber, expressed pride over her husband's operation.
She said: “… after what he has done for Palestine,
I am proud…" Nadia Siksik, wife of the
Shahada-seeker expressed pride over her husband's operation.
She said: “… after I was informed of his death as a Shahid today,
I am proud…"
The bomber's little sister, Dalia, 13, burst into tears while she expressed
her pride over her brother,

"who refused to be a victim of the clash of brothers."

His youngest sister, Dalia, 13, burst into tears while she said:
I am proud of my brother Muhammad,
"for he died a death of honor and
refused to be a victim of the bullets of brothers.
He chose Shahada among his enemies and carried out a brave deed and for the first time in occupied Eilat."


PMW

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Road Map Parallels To Munich Germany

As the UN led by Russia and Islamic nations condemns Israel as an apartheid state and the British prepare to reduce their already puny forces near Basra; as Arabs prepare an intifada over the Temple Mount again and Iran waves its rockets we must review how the Oslo-Road Map process follows the tracks of the phased destruction of Czechoslovakia by British diplomacy in the 1930s. The lessons to be learned grow ever timelier.

The Arabs west of the Jordan River, both Israeli Arabs and those in the Autonomous areas have many more political and economic privileges and benefits than Arabs in any other state. From medical care to virtually free electricity and water, to uncensored media that spew Nazi-style Jew hatred, their liberties reach license. Similarly, in the 1930s "the minorities of Czechoslovakia were the best-treated minorities in Europe and the [Sudeten German] agitations were noticeable precisely because they were living in a democratic liberal state that gave them the freedom to agitate."*

The resemblance of that situation to today's murderously violent Arab agitation in Israel is clear. But the media have grown into a form of global incitement that follows and sometimes helps stage anti-Israel spectaculars: as the Arabs are the open weapon, the media has become the hidden hand of the diplomatic-financial interests. Their polemics are not about market share but to isolate Israel as an "apartheid" state (cf. Jimmy Carter's book) and justify its destruction (per the "Baker group").

Just as British diplomats and officials stirred up the Arab riots of the 1920s and '30s against Jews in the yishuv so their European colleagues enabled Hitler during the 1930s, encouraging even helping finance (via America) Germany to rearm, making statements in Parliament and sending messages in meetings on the continent that Eastern Europe was for the Reich to take. These same diplomats undermined or crushed all those who resisted their grand design. The victim is demonized, delegitimized and dismembered in the modern version of ancient cults of human sacrifice, -- just as Israel is demonized, delegitimized and about to be partitioned in our day.

Remember: even the 1949 lines are not recognized borders but armistice lines. Don't believe that the British Foreign Office or their friends in the State Department have surrendered the goal of an Arab Federation from Baghdad to Cairo. The situation in the Negev (as with the contiguous Gush Katif before it) shows it is being set up to be severed from the State, in whole or in part. Arab attacks and the refusal of Israeli regimes to respond forcefully are meant to make Jews leave. If they don't, they eventually will be dragged out or killed. A Polish-corridor style free access from Gaza to Jericho and the West Bank would be just the start and would lead to a similar result, Arthur Dove's Arab Federation, "its front door on the Mediterranean," a goal aped by Fatah-affiliated groups.

Look at the parallel details in the policies of appeasement, war policies. Beginning in 1935, second President Czech President Eduard Benes made numerous conciliatory offers of self-rule for the Sudeten Germans. These included proportional representation throughout the Republic but they declined it. One thinks of the gift of total autonomy within Area 'A' with which the Arabs remain unsatisfied though Jordan and Egypt gave them no autonomy and little if any services; one thinks of the re-definition of Fatah as "moderates" and Abu Mazen as "a man of courage." Clearly self rule is not what Fatah wants. It was not what the Sudeten, German or British leaders wanted either.

In 1937, Czech Prime Minister Hodza offered to transfer all German administrators serving in the Czech government to the Sudeten area so Germans there could be entirely self-ruled. "Plan after plan for minority rights, economic concessions, cultural and administrative autonomy and even political federalism were produced by the Czechs…but brushed aside as inadequate…" Under British pressure, the Czechs even agreed for dual Czech-German nationality for the Sudetens (similar measures have been proposed for Arabs in Yesha). But "none of these suggestions were acceptable to Konrad Henlein, head of the Sudeten German Party for the simple reason that he wanted no concessions within Czechoslovakia…his real desire was to destroy the Czechoslovak state." Here is a precise description of the position and rejectionist behavior of all the Arab states to an Israeli state, even the possibility of a Jewish state, no matter how small since 1920, from Amin al Husseini to the PLO, Fatah and Hamas today. It's like listening to a tape: they don't want concessions; their real desire is to destroy the Jewish state while western diplomats minimize or back page this ugly fact, the pre-selected outcome of the process. As in 1937-8, the pressure on the victim to submit is relentless, the 'guarantees' increasingly strained and absurd; the professions of allies that they cannot do more to help are precisely the same: false and outcome-based, the outcome being the disintegration of the victim.

But concessions continue to be offered, then and now, under pressure of the great power "friend" of the beleaguered nation in question. Months before Hitler demanded self-rule for the Germans in the Sudetenland, Neville Chamberlain, Lords Halifax and Lothian among others were privately discussing, inadvertently 'leaking' and eventually publicly stating in parliament (March 1938) that the Czechs should cede their entire mountainous region to Germany outright. This demand for compromise was clearly a recipe for dismemberment and ruin because the Czech fortifications were built into the region. The Sudeten Mountains then, the mountains of Judea and Samaria today; a historian asks: how could Czechoslovakia have its peace or even its existence guaranteed by France, as the British claimed it could, after surrendering its key defensive positions when according to the British it could not be guaranteed by France, Russia, and England with these defenses intact because Britain was overextended? As the London Times asserted February 20, even its five thousand troops remaining near Basra may be "significantly drawn down" by late 2008. At the same time, British officers are training PLO Force 17 in Gaza under the eyes of the UN. For this they have time and personnel as they did to train, equip and lead the Arab legion during the 1940s. The writing again is on the wall.

How will the United States, even with the best will in the world guarantee and maintain the existence of Israel minus Judea and Samaria when it claims that peace will never come so long as Israel retains its mountainous heartland and maintains full autonomy for its own people and armed forces? The entire process is one of terrorizing the target state to make suicidal concessions just as was done in 1938.

Another link between those times and ours is the disjunction between the upper diplomatic echelons of western governments and their military, parliaments and people. The purpose of the so-called negotiations with the Czechs (as now with successive Israeli regimes) is to exert pressure to surrender at any cost. The importance of "consultation before partition," Chamberlain said, was that "it could be represented as the choice of the Czechoslovak government," as the expulsion of Gush Katif was sold as the "choice" of a supposedly representative and "democratic" Israel and the "rightwing nationalist" Ariel Sharon. Blackmail in the form of negotiations "would have a more favorable reception from the British public" then as it may from the American public today. Above all, Chamberlain added negotiations and eventual Czech agreement, like a handshake on the White House lawn "would dispose of any idea that we were ourselves carving up Czechoslovak territory." And so it is with administrations in Washington since that of Jimmy Carter.

Given the orchestrated UN uproar against Israel, meant to legitimize Hamas and cover Hizbollah's activities in Lebanon, it is clear that Mr. Carter's book, its title and the timing of its release were not an isolated exercise in individual bias. The resignations from his institute at Emory University are apt but come very late in the day. And as to Russia, the major supplier of Iran's nuclear and missile program and former backer of Egypt, Syria and the PLO: why did American and England let them into the UN at all when the world body was created "to foster democracy?" Because Russia shares and serves, as they have since 1917, various global interests of the Anglo-American elite, mainly the drive toward a regionalized world system that uses constant wars of attrition or "terror" to impose security measures on their own populations.

The gap between the agenda and methods of the diplomatic top tier, western parliaments and general electorates was strong then as now. When six months of betrayals, pressure on the French, and green lights to Hitler had wrung acquiescence from Paris and crippling concessions from the Czechs, Chamberlain found that he had created a monster. At a meeting in Godesborg on September 22, 1938, having repeatedly been assured of and received British diplomatic help Hitler was in a fury, demanding the whole pie immediately without impressive treaties. For everyone but Chamberlain and his clique and the top French diplomatic group it was a deal-breaker; the English and French Cabinets rejected the entire partition plan; the Czechs formed a new Cabinet that rejected it; the Russians served notice that if German forces moved they would invade East Prussia and protect the Czechs. But Chamberlain would not let go of his grand design. With the help of the media his group created a war scare, a terror war in Britain based on grossly exaggerated descriptions of German military might. Having previously ordered the Czechs not to mobilize their forces (shades of summer 2006) they now ordered that they do so. Pronouncements of Germany's military omnipotence filled the news. Through dominance of the media, a small clique can impose its agenda and views on a nation, via hysteria and manufactured despair when they feel it useful.

If Mahmoud Abbas announced tomorrow that he was going to take all of Israel from Eilat to Lebanon and Jerusalem to Tel Aviv would it create as great revulsion and stir? Would Congress, let along the EU or Russia formerly repudiate Oslo and the Road Map? No; the State Department would not even need to order Olmert to mobilize the IDF (for show) and to flood the complicit media with stories about dirty bombs exploding in American cities in order to secure Israel's unilateral surrender, termed "disengagement."

One last parallel to emphasize: just as the Czech armed forces' quantity were on par with those of Germany in fall 1938 (the British government knew this via its military attaches on the continent) and the quality of Czech forces far superior, so is the quality of Israel's armed forces today still far superior to those of its neighbors. The vulnerability of the Germans then was as evident as the weakness of Fatah and Israel's Arab neighbors now. So grave was the German position that the German Chief of Staff and other top officials were prepared to assassinate Hitler on September 28, 1938 if and when he gave the order to invade the Czechs; Arafat, too, in 1982 and afterward, and now Abbas have been and are saved by America and by Israeli regimes. Without its mountain barrier, Jewish settlements, and with EU, UN and NATO troops ready for Judea, Samaria and Gaza military advantages will be gravely compromised as happened to the Czechs without the Sudetenland. And with all governments and major media claiming that "the cycle of violence" will rise without Israeli concessions (that invite attacks by Hamas and Hizbollah on the "apartheid" state and suppress Israeli response), the military advantages of the victim, as great as those in 1938 can be neutered. Milner's words that Palestine "must never become a Jewish state" will be fulfilled.

British diplomats had no problem having Americans rebuild the continent their policies had led to ruin; Anglo-American and EU diplomats would have no problem letting Americans rebuild Israel after a similar process of "consultation before partition." It's good for business and demonstrates authority. Mesopotamia may not be the only killing field in the Middle East unless a sovereign Israel finds and rights itself.

History does repeat; but with awareness of the pattern the game need not again be played till the checkmate: holocaust and a huge spike in global terror.

Gamla

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Supporting Peace Education In The PA?

Anyone who hopes for peace should be horrified by the content of the latest set of Palestinian schoolbooks. In many respects, these new books for Grade 12, written by Fatah-appointed Palestinian educators, are the worst of the textbooks produced by the Palestinian Authority since 2000.

These newest books deny Israel's right to exist, anticipate its destruction and define the conflict with Israel as religious, not merely territorial.

As we point out in our latest report "From Nationalist Battle to Religious Conflict," the ideological divide between Fatah and Hamas appears to be disappearing.

Hamas has always defined its war with Israel as religious and existential, and now that is what all Palestinian children will learn in school: "Ribat for Allah is one of the actions related to jihad for Allah, and it means: Being found in areas where there is a struggle between Muslims and their enemies. The endurance of Palestine's people on their land these days... is one of the greatest of the Ribat." (Islamic Education, grade 12, p. 86-87)

THE PALESTINIAN conflict with Israel is a unique and eternal ribat with a special Islamic destiny: "The reason for this preference [of the Palestinian Ribat] is that the momentous battles in Islamic history took place on its land."
As to when there will be peace with Israel? Never, according to the schoolbooks: "[Palestine's] residents are in a constant struggle with their enemies, and they are found in Ribat until Resurrection Day."

Israel's right to exist is denied and Israel's founding is called a theft: "Palestine's war ended with a catastrophe that is unprecedented in history, when the Zionist gangs stole Palestine and expelled its people from their cities, their villages, their lands and their houses, and established the State of Israel" (Arabic Language, Analysis, Literature and Criticism, grade 12, p. 104). Israel is called: "the Zionist entity," and "Zionist Enemy." Israel's existence since 1948 is an "occupation" (ibid pp. 104, 122).

The conflict will eventually end - not with peace, but with Israel's destruction, effected by Palestinians of all ages and abilities: "Palestine will be liberated by its men, its women, its young and its elderly" (Arabic Language and the Science of Language, grade 12, p. 44).

THE BOOKS anticipate this future destruction of Israel by painting a picture for the Palestinian child of a world in which Israel already does not exist. The place of Israel is marked as "Palestine" on all maps, and "Palestine" is defined as a dawla - the Arabic word for "state," not a geographical region.

This "state" is said to have water access to both the Mediterranean and the Red seas, a situation possible only in a world without Israel. (Physical Geography and Human Geography, grade 12, p. 105)
Likewise, the size of "Palestine," the "state," is said to be more than 10,000 sq. km., a situation possible only if Israel does not exist, since the West Bank and Gaza Strip together total only 6,220 sq. km.

Because Israel has no right to exist, and must be fought and destroyed for Islam, violence and terror against Israel since its founding are justified and glorified as muqawama, resistance: "The tragedy of Palestine of 1948… and afterward the muqawama in which the inhabitants carried acts of most glorious heroism and sacrifice" (Arabic Language, Analysis, Literature and Commentary, grade 12 p. 105).

THE WORLD cringed in horror at the Iranian Holocaust denial conference. But the new PA schoolbooks teach World War II without the Holocaust. There are extensive details about the history of the war, lessons about the Nazi "race theory" and even mention of "an international court to bring to trial the senior Nazi leaders as war criminals." (The History of the Arabs and the World in the 20th Century, grade 12, p. 46).
However, the books fail to mention why the Nazis were on trial, or that their "race theory" involved elimination of Jews and other minorities.

It is clear that the newest PA schoolbooks are a tragic recipe for incessant war. Israel is presented as an illegitimate enemy to be hated, fought and destroyed. Even the most well-meaning student is left with no justification or religious option to accept Israel as a neighbor to live beside in peace.

THEREFORE, anyone who is truly interested in peace and peace education should be appalled by these new books, repudiate this hate material and demand that the books be discontinued and rewritten. US Senator Hillary Clinton said earlier this month that this curriculum, together with PA media targeting children, "basically, profoundly poisons the mind of these children" and that these books are "an indoctrination," not an education.

But an American Jewish group, Brit Tzedek v'Shalom-Jewish Alliance for Justice and Peace has rushed to defend these hate-filled schoolbooks. As reported by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, the group wrote Clinton urging her to "re-examine claims that the Palestinian schoolbooks indoctrinate hate." The group argued that the books encourage "a peaceful resolution of the conflict," and are better than those used in most of the Arab world because they "endorse democracy."

This superficial defense of PA books, compared to the fully-documented, 35-page PMW report, with its line-by-line descriptions of hate education, leaves us with the strong impression that no one from the group has actually read either the schoolbooks or our report. If so, the group's eagerness to defend these new texts is irresponsible.

We just find it hard to believe that Brit Tzedek v'Shalom has actually studied these grade 12 textbooks and is seriously endorsing an educational curriculum that denies Israel's right to exist, justifies terror and promises an eternal religious battle for Israel's destruction, knowingly defending incitement to murder.

TRAGICALLY, the Palestinian Authority will exploit this Jewish group's ill-considered approval of its new texts. Can Brit Tzedek v'Shalom be so blindly determined to champion the Palestinian cause that it will defend even the indefensible? In the past, groups such as Brit Tzedek v'Shalom created sufficient uncertainty about PA hate-education to ease international pressure on Palestinian leaders to pursue peace education.

Our challenge to Brit Tzedek v'Shalom: If you are as dedicated to peace as we are, you have a moral obligation to publicly retract your defense of the PA-sanctioned books described above and demand instead that the authority pursue peace education.

Jerusalem Post

Monday, February 26, 2007

Hizb'allah Building Up Forces North Of Litani River

Hizb'allah is building up reinforcements north of the Litani river in anticipation of another potential war with Israel, the London Times reported on Monday.

According to the report, Hizb'allah guerrillas have begun to gather in the area, which is just outside the area patrolled by UNIFIL troops, with the apparent aim of creating a Shi'ite-controlled buffer that would allow the organization to avoid notice while they build their forces.

The group is reportedly being aided in its enterprise by Shi'ite businessman Ali Tajiddine, a diamond trader with close ties to Hizb'allah, who has begun buying large tracts of land from their Christian and Druse owners to serve as Hizbullah's base of operations.

"The state of Hizb'allah is already in existence in south Lebanon," Druse Lebanese MP Walid Jumblatt was quoted as saying.

UNIFIL's presence in southern Lebanon following last summer's war, along with the IDF's continued operations along Israel's northern border, has hampered Hizb'allah's efforts to rearm and rebuild its forces. However, the group has continued to attempt to smuggle in weapons and train fighters.

Officers in the IDF's Northern Command told Vice Premier Shimon Peres last week that weapons reach Hizb'allah from Syria "on a weekly basis," usually at night, evading UNIFIL peacekeepers stationed in Lebanon.

Earlier this month, a number of bombs disguised as boulders were found along the northern border, raising doubts as to the IDF's and UNIFIL's ability to effectively prevent Hizb'allah from carrying out further attacks on Israel.

Jerusalem Post

Sunday, February 25, 2007

Rude Awakening

Arthur Ruppin, the famed "father of Jewish settlement," was one of the founders - in 1925 - of Brit Shalom, forerunner of Peace Now and assorted allied outlets of unflagging Jewish liberality, naivete, trust in the essential goodness of man and in the destiny of reasonable compromise to triumph over all adversity.

Such utopian sentiments - then especially prevalent among the more refined and urbane Jewish intellectuals of Western Europe and America - gave rise to pacifist dreams of kinship, cooperation and harmony with local Arabs. "Mutual voluntary non-domination," it was envisioned, would facilitate the creation of a bi-national state with a joint government and blissful communal coexistence. Pretty sweet and alluring stuff - if you can get it.

By 1929, though, Ruppin realized that all that sweetness and light was - alas - unattainable. His rude awakening followed the bloody jihad set off by preceding Arab exhortations to "holy war to protect al-Aksa from Jewish conquest." To fan the flames, provocative photomontages of Herzl (then deceased for 25 years) seemingly near the Aksa compound were circulated.

Ruppin wouldn't have been surprised had he heard Raed Sallah inflame passions last weekend and rouse "believers to launch a third intifada to liberate al-Aksa" from Jewish predations. It would all have sounded unpleasantly familiar to Ruppin, already accustomed to ferocious shouts charging, as Sallah just did, that "Jews want to build their Temple in place of al-Aksa, while our blood drenches their clothing, stains their doorposts and saturates their food and drink."

True, Ruppin died before Sallah was born, but harangues identical to the above were delivered by Sallah's spiritual forebears, foremost among them avid Nazi collaborator Haj Amin el-Husseini. There isn't an iota of originality in any of the calculated hysteria Sallah whips up. It's all been done before and because of it Ruppin quit the very Brit Shalom in which he invested so much gullible cerebral energy and wishful thinking.

The fanatic Muslim agitation sprouted with the British Mandate's inception, when Muslims suddenly evinced emotional attachment to the Western Wall, claiming it to be the hitching post where Muhammad tethered his winged steed Burak. Jewish wailing was tolerated there occasionally, after remittance of exorbitant fees for the privilege - providing Muslim sensibilities weren't offended. The problem was there was no telling what would give offense.

TODAY IT'S replacing a collapsed walkway. In 1919, wooden benches for the old and infirm were cited as the insufferable affront. The British promptly removed them, but Arabs then began to regularly drive cattle and laden donkeys through crowds of Jewish worshipers. From 1920 the muezzin was dispatched to bellow his loudest chants precisely during Jewish services.

In 1921, the sound of the shofar blown on the High Holy Days in front of the Wall became the next pretext for unrest. The British obligingly forbade the annoying blasts.

The shrillest Arab outcry was raised in 1928 over a flimsy partition put up to segregate male and female worshipers at the Wall. The British lost no time in removing the insulting screen right at the climax of Yom Kippur services. From then on premeditated disruptions at the Wall grew increasingly violent, till trumped-up tales of Jewish attempts to take over the Temple Mount sent Arabs rioting on August 23, 1929. The bloodbath lasted a full week and left 133 Jews slaughtered.

The rampages began in Jerusalem, but the most notorious massacre was in Hebron, where 67 men, women and children were hacked to death in homicidal frenzy. The centuries-old Jewish community was uprooted, as were smaller Jewish enclaves in Gaza, Jenin, Tulkarm and Nablus.

THAT'S PRECISELY what Sallah has in mind when he urges "a third intifada." The carnage of 1929, still reverentially dubbed by Arabs as "the Burak Battle," is Sallah's jihadist model for liberating the holy site from the presence of Jews (who sanctified it in the first place). When he barefacedly accuses Jews of "aiming to raze al-Aksa," he knows that such falsehoods have already instigated horrific vendettas for counterfeit causes.

Worse yet, Sallah isn't the oddball firebrand. When the entire Arab/Muslim world refuses to condemn flagrant deceptions, it assumes culpability for the calumny and unbridled hate-mongering. The fact that even non-radical peace partners like Jordan and Egypt, and non-Arab Muslim states like Turkey, chime in with Sallah's screeching chorus ought to send shivers down our spines.

The fact that Israel's Arabs rushed to hostile judgment, without allowing easily verifiable facts to interfere with their knee-jerk inimical opinions, ought to deprive us of sleep. If Israeli-Arab leaders score popularity points via incitement, then we're in unimaginable trouble. If Arab Knesset members profess to believe without reservation or hesitation that Israel's ultra-broadminded democracy has nothing better to do than kindle an explosive religious conflict, then we have dangerously deluded ourselves about coexistence even within Israel's pre-1967 borders.

It's time to stop babbling about judicious Arab moderates, about boosting nonexistent Arab restraint with enticing concessions, about the feasibility of deals with those who know full well that we contemplate nothing like what they assert, yet have no inhibitions to furiously fabricate libel.

If we retain any residual self-preservation instincts, we need to own up to the fact that the lies so brazenly spread about us also, inadvertently, impart a critical truth - every bit as bitter as the one Ruppin was man enough to admit: "The conciliatory tone" of the Brit Shalom he led, Ruppin candidly conceded, "was interpreted by the Arabs as weakness."

Nothing new under our sun.

Jerusalem Post

Saturday, February 24, 2007

Aid To Palestinians Increases Since Hamas Election


Following Hamas's victory in last year's Palestinian elections, the international community suspended direct aid to the Palestinian Authority government until the newly empowered Islamist organization renounces violence, recognizes Israel's right to exist and agrees to abide by previous official agreements between Israel and the Palestinians. Opponents of the suspension have decried the policy, claiming it ignited a humanitarian crisis in the Palestinian territories. But in fact, aid to the Palestinians has substantially increased since Hamas took over.

In order to bypass Hamas, Western governments simply redirected aid to the office of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, who at least in theory recognizes Israel. This leaves the Palestinians as the largest recipients per capita of charitable assistance in the world.

The decline in the Palestinian economy has occurred despite the increase in foreign support, and not because of any supposed decrease in aid.

Aid to the Palestinians in 2006

Two recent reports highlight the confusion over aid to the Palestinians. The first, an article in the National Catholic Reporter, asserts:

[T]he decision to cut off aid and impose economic sanctions on the two regions [the West Bank and the Gaza Strip] could lead to an experiment in famine. (“Another Somalia in the Making?,” Neve Gordon, Feb. 2, 2007)

Similarly, an article in the Financial Times states:

Concern is mounting in the international aid community that policies aimed at isolating the Palestinian Authority’s ruling Hamas movement have backfired by further impoverishing the people of Gaza and the West Bank without seriously undermining the Islamists. (“Palestinian aid policies backfiring,” Harvey Morris, Feb.7, 2007)

These assertions overlook the fact that while the Palestinian Authority’s Ministry of Finance is receiving less funds since Hamas took over, the aid has continued to flow to other institutions not controlled by Hamas, in particular the Office of the President. An October 2006 report by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) explains the situation:

Government reciepts and expenditures, instead of being channeled through the Ministry of Finance's Single Treasury Account, are now recieved or made by various institutions, including the MoF (now only to a very limited extent), the Office of the President, ... [and] international donors ....

The IMF notes that the Palestinian Authority received $573 million during the first three quarters of 2006. In a later report, released on Dec. 17, 2006, the IMF estimated that during the last quarter of 2006 the Palestinians had received an additional $136 million, bringing the total for the year to $709 million. This figure is up substantially from the approximately $350 given to the Palestinians in 2005, as reported in the October 2006 IMF report.

Actual receipts might even be higher. Mohammad Yagi, a columnist for the Palestinian daily Al-Ayyam and an analyst for the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, stated that according to the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics total donations to the Palestinians exceeded $760 million this past year.

An article appearing in the Dubai based Gulf News on Dec. 7, 2006 quotes a figure of $900 million in foreign aid during 2006.

Additionally, an estimated $66 million has been smuggled in by Hamas couriers and government ministers, the funds apparently being deposited into the PA Finance Ministry. (See, for example, this Dec. 6, 2006 article in the Jerusalem Post.)

Based on these figures, total donations to the Palestinians amount to at least $775 million, more than doubling total foreign donations reported by the IMF in 2005.

The increased donations offset the reduction in revenue arising out of Israel's decision to withhold money it collects and had agreed to turn over to the Palestinian Authority government on the basis of negotiated agreements with the previous Fatah-dominated Palestinian Authority. According to an article in the Jan. 19, 2007 issue of the International Herald Tribune, Israel withheld $500 million in 2006. This, however, has been softened by Israel's recent decision to transfer to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas $100 million of this revenue.

The overall aid picture is still higher. Not only is funding given to the Office of the President and other governmental or quasi-governmental institutions, but money is also channeled directly to the Palestinian people through humanitarian and development organizations such as UNRWA, Oxfam, the ICRC, UNICEF and others.

Ibrahim Gambari, Undersecretary General for Political Affairs at the UN, explained on Jan. 25, 2007:

Total assistance to Palestinians last year – not including funds channelled to the Palestinian Authority Government or Hamas by regional donors – had been some $1.2 billion, which represented a nearly 10 per cent increase over 2005. Humanitarian assistance alone had doubled since 2004, taking mainly the form of food aid and cash-for-work programmes.

The Real Crisis

Despite the influx of foreign donations, Palestinian productivity has declined, a trend which undoubtedly has increased the suffering of the Palestinian people.

The Palestinian Authority’s Central Bureau of Statistics notes a broad decline in productivity in Gaza and the West Bank that began when the Hamas government took power in early 2006. This decline reversed a gradual improvement that was underway in 2005. According to the Bureau's figures, the per capita gross domestic product in the West Bank and Gaza declined 18.3 percent between the third quarter of 2005 and the third quarter of 2006. And based on continuing trends, it is quite possible that figures for the fourth quarter of 2006 will likely show an even wider gap from this time frame and the fourth quarter of 2005.

Reduced trade with Israel, the single largest trading partner and employer of Palestinians, is certainly one important component of the Palestinian economic deterioration. This decline in trade is a consequence of Hamas's electoral victory in 2006. Hamas's commitment to the destruction of Israel and refusal to renounce violence, the unabated missile bombardment from Gaza of southern Israel, and the continuing attempts to infiltrate suicide bombers into Israel have prompted Israel to establish a security regimen that sharply curtails economic activity between Palestinians and Israelis. Notably, Palestinian groups including Hamas have also attacked crossing points between the Gaza Strip and Israel, for example the Karni cargo terminal, which are vital to the Palestinian economy.

The unstable political situation in Gaza and the West Bank is another cause of economic decline in Palestinian areas. Increased factional and clan violence, which especially in the Gaza Strip has become part of Palestinian life, interferes with normal business activity and discourages private investment.

Journalists who blame economic hardships in the West Bank and Gaza Strip on a nonexistent "cut-off" of international aid mislead the public, and miss out on reporting the actual causes of the recent crisis: the election of a Palestinian government that refuses to recognize—and launches attacks against—its neighbor and largest trading partner; repeated Palestinan attacks on crossing points that are vital to the Palestinian economy; and intra-Palestinian violence bordering on civil war.

Camera